Re: TARBALLS DUE: Will the real 2.3.0 release please stand up?
- From: Jeff Waugh <jdub perkypants org>
- To: Mark McLoughlin <mark skynet ie>
- Cc: GNOME Desktop Hackers <desktop-devel-list gnome org>, GNOME Hackers <gnome-hackers gnome org>
- Subject: Re: TARBALLS DUE: Will the real 2.3.0 release please stand up?
- Date: Fri, 4 Apr 2003 16:00:24 +1000
<quote who="Mark McLoughlin">
> Do you want 2.3.0.1 or 2.3.1 ?
Not fussed, the versioning GEP was really only meant to apply in a strict
way to stable releases and major/minor numbers for unstable releases. You
are totally welcome to use fibonacci numbers, in fact, there's good
precedent for it. ;-)
- Jeff
--
linux.conf.au 2004: Adelaide, Australia http://lca2004.linux.org.au/
If Perl is gaffer, and Python is Magic Tape, then Ruby is self-adhesive
plate gold.
_______________________________________________
gnome-hackers mailing list
gnome-hackers gnome org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-hackers
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]
