Re: EggDateTime status

[Havoc Pennington <hp redhat com>]

Sebastian Rittau <srittau jroger in-berlin de> writes: 
> I agree completely. My original plan stated to include this into GTK,
> and - if that is not possible or not wanted - to include it into
> libgnomeui. But since I got no feedback from gtk-devel, I targetted it
> for libgnomeui for now. I can try to convince Owen that this is a
> worthwhile addition to GTK, though.

Yep. Well, essentially if it's a general-purpose, mature widget we
expect lots of apps to use, then it makes sense in GTK+. If it isn't a
general-purpose widget we expect apps to use, then it doesn't belong
in libgnomeui either - libgnomeui shouldn't be the "not good enough
for GTK" dumping ground. ;-)

What do Evolution, Gnumeric, and other apps like that use for this
sort of widget, by the way? I think meeting their needs would be
important.
 
> P.S. Anyone know who I should write to to get on the white list for this
>      mailing list? It's frustrating to wait for the delay until my mail
>      is approved.

The white list is:
  http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/post-only/

(at least I think that works)

Havoc

_______________________________________________
gnome-hackers mailing list
gnome-hackers gnome org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-hackers