Re: Gdk-pixbuf 0.20.0 is released



<quote who="Tomasz K?oczko">

> Sacalabilities with keep in mind minimal anount of changes will be much 
> better. Why not use:
> 
> ftp://ftp.gnome.org/pub/GNOME/stable/sources/<project> for latest version 
> 
> and:
> 
> ftp://ftp.gnome.org/pub/GNOME/stable/sources/<project>/archive

'stable' was used in the old system -> having a single directory for each
GNOME release. root-level version directories didn't scale, because we have
lots of different GNOME releases and categories.

> ftp://ftp.gnome.org/pub/GNOME/archive/sources/<project>/
> 
> for store all archiv tar balls ?

That's what the complete sources/ directory does. Mirrors can choose to
exclude it, and sync their mirrors with link dereferencing.

> In both cases will even simplify mirroring only latest resources by ommit
> (olny) one directory or ommit directories by regexp.  I can undestand why
> it was performed but IMHO "implementation" sill isn't optimal/best
> possible.

As I said before, we're considering adding latest/ symlink trees, it's just
a matter of finding the best spot/structure for them.

- Jeff

-- 
    "Not only that, but Google is fast. In fact, it's quite competitive     
                          with DNS." - Raph Levien                          
_______________________________________________
gnome-hackers mailing list
gnome-hackers gnome org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-hackers



[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]