Re: Status on API docs, please help to approve it.
- From: "Padraig O'Briain" <Padraig Obriain Sun COM>
- To: gnome-hackers gnome org, micke codefactory se
- Cc: desktop-devel-list gnome org, gnome-doc-list gnome org, gnome-love gnome org, release-team gnome org
- Subject: Re: Status on API docs, please help to approve it.
- Date: Thu, 5 Sep 2002 10:53:18 +0100 (BST)
I have looked at the undocumented symbols in ATK. I have notriced that a
significant number are similar to AtkActionIface.
There is a similar problem in GTK+ with, for example, GtkCellEditableIface. Such
a data structure is output but a data structure such as GtkEditableClass is not
output even though the are the same type of data structure.
Would it be possible to suppress the output of data structures whose name ends
with Iface?
Padraig
>
>
> Hi!
>
> Trying to get the API reference documents in better shape for GNOME 2.2
> I created this summary of the current status of the API docs. It's put
> together from the *-undocumented.txt files created by gtk-doc. For this
> list I've used the branches for the GNOME 2.0.x releases and the result
> might be slightly different for HEAD.
>
> glib: 100%
> gobject: 46% (244/285)
> linc: 56% (15/12)
> atk: 82% (188/42)
> pango: 99% (407/4)
> bonobo-activation: 77% (23/7)
> gdk: 100%
> gtk: 89% (2139/258)
> gdk-pixbuf: 100%
> gconf: 42% (114/155)
> libbonobo: 39% (187/288)
> gnome-vfs: 42% (172/234)
> libglade: 81% (42/10)
> libgnome: 100%
> libgnomecanvas: 75% (101/33)
> libgnomeui: 57% (488/374) (** Malcolm is working on this **)
> libgnomeprint: 20% (48/190)
> gail: 81% (13/3)
> gnome-panel: 64% (18/10)
> vte: 0% no docs at all.
>
> Looking at this some of the modules shouldn't be too hard to get up to
> 100% while some others would require more help.
>
> I've also tried to add the API-doc keyword to all the bugs I could find
> about it in the GNOME Bugzilla. It's only the Gtk+ (with friends)
> modules that keeps a close tracks of API documentation bugs (at least
> that I could find easily. If you are a maintainer of a core library and
> know that you have API doc items in your bugzilla modules, please add
> the API-doc keyword to them. Please also add me 'micke codefactory se'
> to the CC-line so that I can help track these issues.
>
> http://makeashorterlink.com/?U1CB231A1
>
> If you are interested in helping out on documenting some of these
> modules please let me know and I'll try to help out coordinate the
> effort.
>
> Regards,
> Mikael Hallendal
> --
> Mikael Hallendal micke codefactory se
> CodeFactory AB http://www.codefactory.se/
> Office: +46 (0)8 587 583 05 Cell: +46 (0)709 718 918
>
> _______________________________________________
> desktop-devel-list mailing list
> desktop-devel-list gnome org
> http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
_______________________________________________
gnome-hackers mailing list
gnome-hackers gnome org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-hackers
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]