Re: Non-POSIX shells
- From: Sander Vesik <Sander Vesik Sun COM>
- To: ERDI Gergo <cactus cactus rulez org>
- Cc: Havoc Pennington <hp redhat com>, gnome-hackers gnome org
- Subject: Re: Non-POSIX shells
- Date: Tue, 5 Mar 2002 21:42:39 +0000 (GMT)
On Tue, 5 Mar 2002, ERDI Gergo wrote:
> On Tue, 5 Mar 2002, Steve Swales wrote:
>
> > I realize it was just an example, but bash is actually pre-installed on Solaris
> > since Solaris 8. I do agree that people should try to stick to the POSIX
> > semantics for shell scripts.
>
> Just to make it clear: $() is POSIX.
>
You sure it's "$(varname)" and not "${varname}" ?
Also, posix is not just one but a series of standards with their specific
release dates and something shipping before say the release of thelatest
revision obviously cannot conform all that easily...
> --
> .--= ULLA! =---------------------. `We are not here to give users what
> \ http://cactus.rulez.org \ they want' -- RMS, at GUADEC 2001
> `---= cactus cactus rulez org =---'
> A szépség és az intelligencia szorzata állandó.
>
>
Sander
I see a dark sail on the horizon
Set under a dark cloud that hides the sun
Bring me my Broadsword and clear understanding
_______________________________________________
gnome-hackers mailing list
gnome-hackers gnome org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-hackers
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]