Re: Non-POSIX shells



Havoc wrote:
>If we're going to require something funky it should be a reasonable
>build tool instead of make/autoconf/libtool jury-rigging. ;-)

agreed

>I don't think there's a reason to make Solaris users install bash,
>it's easy to use `` instead of $().

I realize it was just an example, but bash is actually pre-installed on Solaris 
since Solaris 8.  I do agree that people should try to stick to the POSIX 
semantics for shell scripts.

-steve

Steve Swales
Senior Manager, Platform Globalization Engineering
X.Org Chairperson
Sun Microsystems, Inc.
2515 North First Street, MS USJC07-201
San Jose, CA 95131
Direct 408 635-0623
Fax    408 635-0670
E-mail steve swales sun com

_______________________________________________
gnome-hackers mailing list
gnome-hackers gnome org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-hackers



[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]