Re: Handling Nautilus in bugzilla

[Luis Villa <louie ximian com>]

On Tue, 2002-03-05 at 11:31, Darin Adler wrote:
> On 3/5/02 8:00 AM, "Luis Villa" <louie ximian com> wrote:
> 
> > I'd like to have a 1.2 and 1.2.x milestone as well (as per some email
> > with Darin that slipped through the cracks this weekend and did not get
> > followed up on.) 
> 
> Those would be the wrong names, since the final version of 1.1 is going to
> be 1.2.

1.2.x would be for features/bugs that are important, but not
regressions. For example, performance on NFS/AFS has always made
nautilus unusable for many large installations; this doesn't really need
to be fixed for 1.2.0 (since it is not a regression) 

> Also, I don't know what email you are talking about. Maybe you mean some bug
> change notifications that you expected me to respond to? I don't have any
> email marked for followup.

Lack of followup on my end, not yours. Sorry that was unclear.

> It would be helpful to more clearly distinguish new incoming bug reports for
> Nautilus 1 from Nautilus 2, and the version field isn't working well for
> that. Perhaps we should try what Alex suggests.

If that works for you guys, fine by me.

Luis [frustrated at my apparent inability to come up with something that
works for the GNOME project, instead of hackish solutions for each
specific sub-project. :/]

_______________________________________________
gnome-hackers mailing list
gnome-hackers gnome org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-hackers