Re: Lets get branches names right this time (was: Re: Proposed release process/plans)

[Bill Haneman <bill haneman sun com>]

On Thu, 2002-06-13 at 16:10, Chema Celorio wrote:
> Havoc wrote..
> > Implementation note: the branch isn't actually called "2-0", the
> > precise branch name is "gnome-2-0", "gnome-2-2", etc. for modules that
> > use GNOME-wide branch names, and may be different for some modules.
> 
> Branches name
>  
> It would be a lot easier if all branches for gnome 2.0 where the same.
> The proposal was "gnome-2-0" but there are some modules branched with
> "gnome-2-0-0" (libbonobo for one). Maybe I am exaggerating and this is
> not as important as it seems to me, but having the same branches name
> will make things easier down the road. Could we re-branch the modules to
> match "gnome-2-0"?

I think this should be gnome-2-0-0 also.

I am planning to commit 2.0.1 fixes to HEAD of the accessibility
modules, and hold features until post 2.0.1.

-Bill

 
> regards,
> Chema
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> gnome-hackers mailing list
> gnome-hackers gnome org
> http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-hackers
> 


_______________________________________________
gnome-hackers mailing list
gnome-hackers gnome org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-hackers