Re: [G2R] Re: libwnck status & gnome-core



On Fri, 2002-01-18 at 14:43, Michael Meeks wrote:
> Hi Havoc,
> 
> On Fri, 2002-01-18 at 19:14, Havoc Pennington wrote:
> > No, libwnck has no compat guarantees. It is AFAIK like GtkHTML2
> 
> 	GtkHML2 has AFAIR made some commitments towards API stability, as
> opposed to commitments towards API instability ;-)

michael,

this is not the issue you think it is, so i suggest you just drop it.

it's not going to be a problem:

    1.  nobody is going to break the API maliciously
    2.  things will be fixed when the api changes
    3.  this wasn't a problem for things such as bonobo, evolution, and
    nautilus which certain distributions have been shipping for quite
    some time.

this is only an intellectual argument, and the only losers are the
users[1].

so please, can we just stop blowing it out of proportion?

[1] they are the losers in this argument, not losers in general

jacob 
-- 
"In fact, can you imagine anything more terrifying than a zombie clown?"
	-- moby
_______________________________________________
gnome-hackers mailing list
gnome-hackers gnome org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-hackers



[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]