Re: GNOME 2.0 Desktop 'Alpha' Release

[ERDI Gergo <cactus cactus rulez org>]

On 11 Jan 2002, jacob berkman wrote:

> i umm thought this was supposed to be fixed in gnome 2.

no, what was fixed was not binding the prefix of independent packages to
the prefix of libgnome*.
you'd also need to modify the contents of the .pc files when relocation
occurs...

-- 
   .--= ULLA! =---------------------.   `We are not here to give users what
   \     http://cactus.rulez.org     \   they want'  -- RMS, at GUADEC 2001
    `---= cactus cactus rulez org =---'
chown -R us.us yourbase (#gnome)

_______________________________________________
gnome-hackers mailing list
gnome-hackers gnome org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-hackers