Re: Patch to get gnome-vfs building against HEAD
- From: Michael Meeks <michael ximian com>
- To: Jody Goldberg <jody gnome org>
- Cc: Havoc Pennington <hp redhat com>, Peter Williams <peter newton cx>, GNOME Hackers <gnome-hackers gnome org>
- Subject: Re: Patch to get gnome-vfs building against HEAD
- Date: 16 Dec 2002 18:21:58 +0000
On Mon, 2002-12-16 at 18:15, Jody Goldberg wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 16, 2002 at 01:49:57PM +0000, Michael Meeks wrote:
> > To a scad of configure.in's PKG_CONFIG checks ? that just has to mean
> > that the -pthread is getting fumbled somewhere inside pkg-config -
> > surely.
>
> Its not pkg-config, its libtool.
> The failures are for executables that are specifying their link line
> as libfoo.la. Where the .la is not including -pthread. The
> solution is to add FOO_LIBS (or whatever the pkg-config output was)
Fine - so I simply don't understand how this patch to configure.in
which adds gthread-2.0 - despite that being a dependency of
bonobo-activation-2.0 -> ORBit2 -> linc:
@@ -42,7 +42,8 @@
bonobo-activation-2.0 >= 1.0.0 \
libxml-2.0 >= 2.4.20 \
gconf-2.0 >= 1.1.9 \
- gtk+-2.0 >= 2.0.2"
+ gtk+-2.0 >= 2.0.2 \
+ gthread-2.0 >= 2.0.2"
can possibly make any difference;
Of course; I can perhaps see a Makefile.am patch adding $(FOO_CFLAGS)
or somesuch to the build might work nicely but ...
Still confused,
Michael.
--
mmeeks gnu org <><, Pseudo Engineer, itinerant idiot
_______________________________________________
gnome-hackers mailing list
gnome-hackers gnome org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-hackers
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]