Re: GNOME 2.0 Platform Alpha Deadline - Sep 26, 2001

[Daniel Veillard <veillard redhat com>]

On Tue, Sep 18, 2001 at 08:46:04AM -0700, Ian McKellar wrote:
> libwww is really evil. Its far too complex for almost everything you'll want
> to do. I would like to see gnome-http replaced in gnome-2.0 because we 
> already have some HTTP support in gnome-vfs and libxml. As far as I'm aware
> the main feature we're lacking from the HTTP support in gnome-2.0 is POST
> support. If adding this will let us drop gnome-http from the platform then

  People from Catalyst (network equipement) are using libxml nanohttp to 
save content through HTTP POST (one can also use PUT). I didn't used
it but I would trust them on this kind of stuff.

Daniel

-- 
Daniel Veillard      | Red Hat Network http://redhat.com/products/network/
veillard redhat com  | libxml Gnome XML XSLT toolkit  http://xmlsoft.org/
http://veillard.com/ | Rpmfind RPM search engine http://rpmfind.net/

_______________________________________________
gnome-hackers mailing list
gnome-hackers gnome org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-hackers