Re: API docs locations
- From: Sander Vesik <Sander Vesik Sun COM>
- To: "R.I.P. Deaddog" <maddog linuxhall org>
- Cc: Havoc Pennington <hp redhat com>, Anders Carlsson <andersca gnu org>, Gnome Hacker List <gnome-hackers gnome org>, Gnome Doc List <gnome-doc-list gnome org>
- Subject: Re: API docs locations
- Date: Mon, 3 Sep 2001 10:52:47 +0100 (BST)
On Mon, 3 Sep 2001, R.I.P. Deaddog wrote:
> On 2 Sep 2001, Havoc Pennington wrote:
>
> > > However, under the perspective of packagers,
> > > /usr/share/doc/packagename-version/html can be a very bad choice, since
> > > %doc will install various docs there. I'm not sure about Redhat and Debian,
> > > but for Mandrake docs, %doc directory will be 'rm -rf'ed before placing
> > > any docs there, thus losing all API docs.
> >
> > Red Hat probably does this too, but it seems pretty dumb if we can't
> > put real docs in /usr/share/doc. We could ideally do some RPM fixage
> > or come up with a hack for this. I'll ask the RPM experts.
> >
> > Just occurred to me that including the version in the directory name
> > might make cross references hard to set up. (e.g. from GTK docs to
> > GLib docs)
>
> How about something like /usr/share/doc/gnome/...... which still conforms
> FHS and won't be removed during packaging?
>
And is positively broken in lots of cases. Starting with people wanting to
install on machines where they don't have root and can't change anything
in /usr/share.
>
> Abel
>
Sander
I haven't been vampired. You've been Weatherwaxed.
_______________________________________________
gnome-hackers mailing list
gnome-hackers gnome org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-hackers
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]