Re: pending bonobo-config problems

["R.I.P. Deaddog" <maddog linuxhall org>]

On 10 Oct 2001, Havoc Pennington wrote:

> How are you determining what conflicts with bonobo-conf? I don't get
> some of the conflicts you seem to be fixing:
>
> >  libbonobo_configinclude_HEADERS =	 		\
> >  	Bonobo_Config.h				\
> > +	bonobo-config-bag.h			\
> >  	bonobo-config-database.h		\
> > -	bonobo-property-frame.h			\
>
> bonobo-config and bonobo-conf headers are in different subdirs, so
> this should not cause conflicts.

True, I failed to tell that this patch contains other things than conflicts
too. The bonobo-property-frame.h seems to be a residue of bonobo-conf, and
is not used by bonobo-config at all. However bonobo-config-bag.h is used
but not installed.


> > -<oaf_server iid="OAFIID:Bonobo_Moniker_ditem_Factory" type="exe" location="@MONIKER_BINDIR@/bonobo-moniker-ditem">
> > +<oaf_server iid="OAFIID:Bonobo_Moniker_ditem_Factory" type="exe"
> > location="@MONIKER_BINDIR@/bonobo-moniker-ditem-2">
>
> There's no ditem in bonobo-conf that I see, so this shouldn't need renaming.

Just to keep the version of different binaries consistent. Having one
binary named version 2 and another no versioning seems strange to me :)

Abel


_______________________________________________
gnome-hackers mailing list
gnome-hackers gnome org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-hackers