Re: GNOME 2 developer documentation

[Owen Taylor <otaylor redhat com>]

Maciej Stachowiak <mjs noisehavoc org> writes:

> On 07Oct2001 03:41PM (-0600), John Fleck wrote:
> > On Sun, Oct 07, 2001 at 02:12:03PM -0700, Seth Nickell wrote:
> > > 
> > > Just for reference, can you list the various modules in these categories
> > > (by your count)?
> > > 
> > > -seth
> > > 
> > 
> > Sure. "API docs" means there's gtk-docs-generated API documentation in
> > the package. It doesn't mean it's up-to-date. That's one of the things
> > I'm trying to find out.
> 
> At one point we wanted to have an automated script that would generate
> an API docs percent coverage table for all the GNOME2 modules. I think
> this would be a really useful for getting all of them to 100%.

As soon as they go into the automated doc build on developer.gnome.org
they will appear on:

 http://developer.gnome.org/doc/API/status.shtml

Were you wanting something more than this?

I haven't tried to extend the doc building for the 2.0 platform
beyond GTK+ yet, but assuming the module divisions, branch names
(or lack of such) install locations, etc, have settled down
now, it shouldn't be much of a problem.

                                        Owen

[
 The gtk-doc patches that do this need a bit of updating - right now
 They aren't counting functions that are missing from foo-sections.txt.
 So the numbers are somewhat optimistic. The GLib 1003/1003 number
 number is right, however. Many thanks to Matthias Clasen!
]

_______________________________________________
gnome-hackers mailing list
gnome-hackers gnome org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-hackers