Re: intltool
- From: jacob berkman <jacob ximian com>
- To: Havoc Pennington <hp redhat com>
- Cc: Darin Adler <darin bentspoon com>, Gnome Hackers <gnome-hackers gnome org>
- Subject: Re: intltool
- Date: 05 Oct 2001 15:01:51 -0400
On Fri, 2001-10-05 at 14:24, Havoc Pennington wrote:
>
> Darin Adler <darin bentspoon com> writes:
> > intltool is supposed to obsolete xml-i18n-tools; that's what the cvs spec
> > file does. If you decide that instead it should provide xml-i18n-tools that
> > would be OK too I guess. I don't really understand the distinction in the
> > RPM world.
> >
>
> You do both, provide and also obsolete. This is so that old packages'
> requirements for xml-i18n-tools can be filled by an intltool package.
iirc what doesn't work if one does this is if other packages have
"Requires: xml-i18n-tools >= foo".
am i incorrect here?
jacob
--
_______________________________________________
gnome-hackers mailing list
gnome-hackers gnome org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-hackers
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]