Re: GNOME user environment brainstorming

[Havoc Pennington <hp redhat com>]

ERDI Gergo <cactus cactus rulez org> writes:
> 
> Please don't remove all the fun parts that give GNOME its spirit ("The F
> in GNOME stands for Fun"). Removing some (like the binary clock[1]:) is OK
> but Wanda has been with us since the very beginning, we shouldn't dump her
> now that we're successful and can stand on our own without any help from
> her:)
> 
> [1] A friend of mine actually uses the binary clock -- he said it took him
> two or three days to get used to it, but now he's so much into it that 
> he's even thinking about creating a hardware bnary clock:)
> 

FWIW I meant "unacceptable to remove Wanda" not "Wanda is
unacceptable." Horrors that anyone should think otherwise. ;-) 

I think something like Binary Clock is fine under the Amusements
menu. I just don't think it should be where it can be confused with an
actual clock. And > 1 non-toy clocks is just dumb.

Havoc

_______________________________________________
gnome-hackers mailing list
gnome-hackers gnome org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-hackers