Re: Eazel's IP/copyright

[jg pa dec com (Jim Gettys)]

Even better would be for the copyrights to go to the individuals who wrote
the code.

I don't like single points of failure, and that includes the FSF.

On the other hand, MOST important is that the copyrights reflect reality.
If you say FSF, you really should have bothered to assign them, or they
have no standing in court.
				- Jim


> From: Sri Ramkrishna <sri aracnet com>
> To: <gnome-hackers gnome org>
> Subject: Eazel's IP/copyright
> -----
> Out of curiosity, has most of Eazel's work been assigned to Eazel as a
> copyright?  Should it be assigned to GNOME foundation or something?  FSF?
> I wasn't certain if Nautilus's works were assigned to the company as an
> entity or not.
> 
>
--
Jim Gettys
Technology and Corporate Development
Compaq Computer Corporation
jg pa dec com


_______________________________________________
gnome-hackers mailing list
gnome-hackers gnome org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-hackers