Re: Application "std-moniker" (process 744) has crashed due to a fatal error
- From: Maciej Stachowiak <mjs eazel com>
- To: Ettore Perazzoli <ettore ximian com>
- Cc: Miguel de Icaza <miguel ximian com>, Michael Meeks <michael ximian com>, gnome-components-list gnome org, evolution-hackers ximian com, gnome-hackers gnome org
- Subject: Re: Application "std-moniker" (process 744) has crashed due to a fatal error
- Date: 17 Mar 2001 16:48:59 -0800
Ettore Perazzoli <ettore ximian com> writes:
> On 16 Mar 2001 16:10:31 -0500, Miguel de Icaza wrote:
> > I am sensing that we should stop looking at .oafinfo files, or oaf
> > should have a flag that allows .oaf things to override anything that
> > was defined as an oafinfo. If there are clashes in .oafinfo and .oaf
> > files, the .oaf takes precedence.
> >
> > Otherwise this is going to become a nightmakre (I dont think saying,
> > go rm some files to get your gnome working is a good idea).
>
> I couldn't agree more.
>
I'm happy to make this change now that everyone is moved
over. However, the transition problems aren't going to affect anyone
installing from packages, and I am not sure how many people are left
that build from source who have not fixed this already in their own
copies. So I don't think it's hugely urgent. I'll try to make the
change by the next OAF release.
- Maciej
_______________________________________________
gnome-hackers mailing list
gnome-hackers gnome org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-hackers
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]