Re: GConf and bonobo-config - some ideas
- From: George <jirka 5z com>
- To: Havoc Pennington <hp redhat com>
- Cc: Dietmar Maurer <dietmar ximian com>, Elliot Lee <sopwith redhat com>, gnome-hackers gnome org
- Subject: Re: GConf and bonobo-config - some ideas
- Date: Sat, 30 Jun 2001 16:10:12 -0700
On Thu, Jun 21, 2001 at 01:37:04PM -0400, Havoc Pennington wrote:
> Dietmar Maurer <dietmar ximian com> writes:
> > The question is if this is a common usage scenario. So what other
> > examples exists?
> >
>
> Well, I think you can always replace dynamic key names with a
> sufficiently complex data structure at a single key - so no, I can't
> think of an example where you can't do that. The issue is simply
> whether it's a good idea to do that. ;-)
Reading this thread a bit late and perhaps not knowing what the fuck am I
talking about. But dynamic keypaths is soemthing I'll need in the panel.
There are per-applet configurations that just cannot be fixed. Grapevine
currently does a weird hack to get this right by generating a unique part
of the path for each applet and PonG currently handles that as well.
I cannot possibly think how this can be replaced with a complex enough
structure without MAJOR reaces.
George
--
George <jirka 5z com>
What luck for the rulers that men do not think.
-- Adolf Hitler
_______________________________________________
gnome-hackers mailing list
gnome-hackers gnome org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-hackers
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]