Re: Release coordination - a clarification
- From: Jon Trowbridge <trow ximian com>
- To: Seth Aaron Nickell <snickell Stanford EDU>
- Cc: GNOME hackers <gnome-hackers gnome org>
- Subject: Re: Release coordination - a clarification
- Date: 23 Jun 2001 20:25:06 -0500
On 23 Jun 2001 13:30:22 -0700, Seth Aaron Nickell wrote:
> Show of hands is a very
> effective technique for trying to reach consensus in a group of live
> people, and I think it would be worth exploring how we might reach a
> similar effect using electronic means.
It may be effective for reaching consensus[1], but I'm not convinced that
it is a good way to make technical decisions.
Personally, I'd feel utterly unqualified to vote on this issue. Havoc and
Michael Meeks[2] are both smart guys who I like and who I would normally
be perfectly happy to defer to on technical issues where I don't know
enough to have my own well-formed opinion. I've never used gconf or
bonobo-config, and I've never really thought about all of the issues
involved in a configuration system. For me (or anyone, IMHO) to cast a
vote under those circumstances would be intellectually dishonest.
So to me, excluding everyone except a small group of qualified people
from any vote makes perfect sense. The right technical decision won't
always necessarily be the most popular decision.
-JT
[1] ...and yet I'm still not convinced. Voting is a tool for making
decisions when there is a lack of consensus. It is not a means
of reaching consensus.
[2] Here I use Michael as a placeholder for the pro-bonobo-config
forces.
_______________________________________________
gnome-hackers mailing list
gnome-hackers gnome org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-hackers
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]