Re: control center plans, etc.
- From: Bill Haneman <Bill Haneman sun com>
- To: stephen browne sun com, glynn foster sun com
- Cc: danw ximian com, gnome-hackers gnome org, gnomecc-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: control center plans, etc.
- Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2001 11:23:53 +0100 (BST)
Glynn said:
>You see this stems back to another usability issue that I
>remember Calum talking about....So if we have access to
>the capplets in nautilus, control center shell, through the
>menus, through commandline [by typing in blah-properties-capplet]
>we now have 4 ways of accessing this stuff....Actually
>potentially 5 if we allow sys admins to be able to script this
>sort of stuff through gconf.
>IMHO, this is *way* too many....and I think this is confusing to
>users, devastating to documentation...and in general complete
>overkill.
I am not really convinced that this is the case. Users already have
(potentially) many ways to launch apps - panel, menus, commandline,
browser plugins....
and they have come to expect this flexibility.
<opinion>
As long as 'apps' (and i include capplets here, from the user's
viewpoint) are available consistently *in the way the user prefers* then
there is no problem if these apps are available vis other routes as
well, at least from a usability perspective. It only looks broken to
the user if some apps must be launched one way, others another way,
etc...
</opinion>
-Bill
> Anyways, what do I know?...
> See ya,
> Glynn ;)
>
>_______________________________________________
>gnome-hackers mailing list
>gnome-hackers gnome org
>http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-hackers
>
>
------
Bill Haneman x19279
Gnome Accessibility / Batik SVG Toolkit
Sun Microsystems Ireland
_______________________________________________
gnome-hackers mailing list
gnome-hackers gnome org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-hackers
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]