Re: control center plans, etc.
- From: Maciej Stachowiak <mjs noisehavoc org>
- To: Havoc Pennington <hp redhat com>
- Cc: jacob ximian com, hovinen ximian com, gnome-hackers gnome org
- Subject: Re: control center plans, etc.
- Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2001 16:39:55 -0700
On 19Jun2001 07:16PM (-0400), Havoc Pennington wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I don't know of a dedicated list for this, so mailing gnome-hackers
> and control-center maintainers.
>
> I'm considering implementing a simplified control panel scheme as
> discussed in this thread:
>
> http://lists.eazel.com/pipermail/nautilus-list/2001-May/003210.html
>
> I'm looking at doing this against the stable branch, with a port to
> HEAD and merge upstream if people want.
>
Hi Havoc,
John Harper implemented a version of this for the stable branch
already, along with the ability to browse control pannel applets
through Nautilus, and an instant-change UI with Undo. I think he
posted it on the list a couple of weeks ago.
I think the most productive work would be to productize the work he
did, and also to port it to the new bonobo-based control-center once
that is ready (he had to implement things in a really hacky way
because of the way the control-center works (capplets get forked and
then expect to find and add themselves into the unique instance of the
control-center shell object; this is rife with race conditions anyway
and really ought to be fixed).
Regards,
Maciej
> Basically there are just a few simple features:
>
> - hack the control center to be a shell around one capplet
> (separate window for each capplet), kill try/revert,
> kill menubar/statusbar/tree-on-the-side
>
> - add the "user prefs" virtual folder to Nautilus, icons in
> here launch a single standalone control panel
>
> - add the "system settings" virtual folder to Nautilus
> (contains Red Hat config tools in the Red Hat release)
>
> - have panel submenus that are equivalent to those folders
>
> - for future control panels there's no need to use libcapplet,
> etc., since control panels are just little dialogs they
> can just be small apps with no embedding involved.
>
> So, what are the current control center plans, how does this fit in,
> how much of this should go in CVS, on what branches should it go, etc.
>
> I see there are some changes in control-center HEAD but don't know
> what the plans are there.
>
_______________________________________________
gnome-hackers mailing list
gnome-hackers gnome org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-hackers
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]