Re: GConf and bonobo-config - some ideas
- From: ERDI Gergo <cactus cactus rulez org>
- To: Elliot Lee <sopwith redhat com>
- Cc: gnome-hackers gnome org
- Subject: Re: GConf and bonobo-config - some ideas
- Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2001 22:27:56 +0200 (CEST)
On Tue, 19 Jun 2001, Elliot Lee wrote:
> * Using Bonobo directly via CORBA is painful, and no current examples of
> this exist, so the benefits of this are hypothetical at best.
What do you mean by `using Bonobo'? Because a lot of the interfaces are
not wrapped in C because it wouldn't make much sense, so you do in fact
use `raw' CORBA calls on them.
I do agree that using Bonobo _completely_ without the GNOME implementation
is painful, but it can be done (at least it could be done some time ago)
(I guess it's time for my bimonthly MonkeyBeans plug:))
--
.--= ULLA! =---------------------. `We are not here to give users what
\ http://cactus.rulez.org \ they want' -- RMS, at GUADEC 2001
`---= cactus cactus rulez org =---'
Well I think so Brain, but if they called them sad meals the kids wouldn't buy them.
_______________________________________________
gnome-hackers mailing list
gnome-hackers gnome org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-hackers
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]