Re: About GNOME 2.0 - The end of a dream
- From: Alan Cox <alan redhat com>
- To: miguel ximian com (Miguel de Icaza)
- Cc: alan redhat com (Alan Cox), veillard redhat com, dietmar ximian com (Dietmar Maurer), hp redhat com (Havoc Pennington), martin home-of-linux org (Martin Baulig), gnome-hackers gnome org, gnome-2-0-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: About GNOME 2.0 - The end of a dream
- Date: Sun, 17 Jun 2001 17:49:06 -0400 (EDT)
> I do not understand this point, or how this is related to the
> discussion. My guess is that this is some kind of mean comment about
> the gnome-core maintainership problem that I created with George. A
> problem that I have apologized for, and that has been solved amicably.
>
> Or is this unreleated and I am not understanding?
Its not the only time that has happened though - zvt ? Bitching aside since
that wasnt the aim if we have a maintainer with power over a package then
transitions of maintainers - whether good, accidentally mean, or indifferent
ought to be by consensus - and that seems to be the board.
Alan
_______________________________________________
gnome-hackers mailing list
gnome-hackers gnome org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-hackers
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]
