Re: GNOME 2.0 planning: A longer range roadmap

[Darin Adler <darin eazel com>]

on 2/21/01 11:06 AM, Paolo Molaro at lupus ximian com wrote:

> Attached there is a DTD for .oaf files, it should be correct, but an
> XML guru could double check it.
> Interestingly it found a bug in a .oaf file I have installed:
> 
> $ xmllint --noout  --postvalid --dtdvalid oaf.dtd
> /usr/share/oaf/Nautilus_View_sidebar-loser.oaf
> No declaration for attribute _value on element oaf_attribute
> Document /usr/share/oaf/Nautilus_View_sidebar-loser.oaf does not validate
> against oaf.dtd

I'm pretty sure that's a bug in the DTD, not in the ".oaf" file. There
should be "_value" attributes (not yet translated) only in ".oaf.in" files.
Actual ".oaf" files should only have "value" (no underscore, already
translated) attributes.

    -- Darin


_______________________________________________
gnome-hackers mailing list
gnome-hackers gnome org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-hackers