Re: GNOME 2.0 conversation

[Maciej Stachowiak <mjs eazel com>]

Havoc Pennington <hp redhat com> writes:

> Maciej Stachowiak <mjs eazel com> writes:
> > Havoc Pennington <hp redhat com> writes:
> > 
> > > 
> > > If you mean the GO vs. OpenOffice discussion, the board did make a
> > > final decision to just include both and not worry about trying to
> > > decide this issue for or against either suite in any way.
> > > 
> > 
> > No we didn't. We decided not to decide for now, since we don't have
> > enough information. That's very different. I definitely do not agree
> > that "just include both" is a good long-term strategy.
> > 
> 
> That's not what I remember, but I may be on crack. I suppose some
> foundation-announce diving would reveal the historical record.
> 

I remember you saying we should just say "we include both", I remember
objecting and saying we don't have enough info to say whether
OpenOffice will be worth including at all, whether current GNOME
Office will have enough advantages to be worth including, or whether
the benefits of including both outweight the costs.

But I guess I don't remember what got put in the minutes.

Anyway, if we did officially say we would include both, I object to
that because I still do not see how we can make that call based on
facts available.

 - Maciej

_______________________________________________
gnome-hackers mailing list
gnome-hackers gnome org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-hackers