Re: URIs vs. half-baked URIs [glib PATCH]
- From: Daniel Veillard <veillard redhat com>
- To: Owen Taylor <otaylor redhat com>
- Cc: Maciej Stachowiak <mjs noisehavoc org>, Alex Larsson <alexl redhat com>, Darin Adler <darin bentspoon com>, gtk-devel-list gnome org, gnome-hackers gnome org
- Subject: Re: URIs vs. half-baked URIs [glib PATCH]
- Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2001 19:17:01 -0400
On Fri, Aug 24, 2001 at 07:10:25PM -0400, Owen Taylor wrote:
> > 2) Normalize the character sequence according to Normalization Form
> > C, as defined in [IETFNorm]. (See further discussion in Section
> > 3.1.)
>
> This step is problematical ... it's easy enough to do in GLib-2.0, but
> since the NFC transformation is not reversible, if a filename is not
> in NFC already, this transformation will loose information that we
> need to uniquely, or at least, efficiently, identify the file.
Right I should not have quoted that part.
> I don't think we should do this in GLib. You couldn't call open() on
> the result of the filename => URI => filename transformation and
> expect it to work.
Agreed, too dangerous. There is actually 2 school of thought about
normalization and usually what's prevails is normalize on input so that
you don't get risks of inconsistencies if done internally. In the case
of a filename it's too late the file has been done. Maybe in 10 years when
we switch to the next generation of OSes :-)
Daniel
--
Daniel Veillard | Red Hat Network http://redhat.com/products/network/
veillard redhat com | libxml Gnome XML XSLT toolkit http://xmlsoft.org/
http://veillard.com/ | Rpmfind RPM search engine http://rpmfind.net/
_______________________________________________
gnome-hackers mailing list
gnome-hackers gnome org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-hackers
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]