Re: GNOME CVS: libgnome martin
- From: Martin Baulig <martin home-of-linux org>
- To: Michael Meeks <michael ximian com>
- Cc: Alan Cox <alan redhat com>, Tim Janik <timj gtk org>, Joe Shaw <joe ximian com>, Hacking Gnomes <gnome-hackers gnome org>, <gnome-2-0-list gnome org>
- Subject: Re: GNOME CVS: libgnome martin
- Date: 12 Aug 2001 00:32:31 +0200
Michael Meeks <michael ximian com> writes:
> FWIW, I agree with Martin. The API we release, we get to support
> for a long time - probably far longer than we think. Thus, it is far, far
> better IMHO to release only a few, reasonably high quality APIs - than
> many substandard, known to be broken ones.
>
> It also strikes me that the accessibility guys will need to be
> able to play sounds on events; and that it seems entirely likely to me
> that they will be able to do it 'right' at some stage, probably soon.
>
> And of course, I spend my life cursing esd, and have never have
> sounds turned on, except in a moment of acclimatization madness when I
> discovered them some time ago.
Btw. there's absolutely no need to have this in libgnome anymore.
gnome-triggers won't work anymore anyways since everything which was
using it (GnomeDialog and GnomeMessageBox) is gone - so to make this
right, this'd need to be done in GTK+ anyways.
On the other hand, there's no problem with just using CSL in whatever
application wants to use sound - and CSL was already designed as a
sound-backend independent wrapper library - so I don't see a reason to
write a wrapper around a wrapper.
--
Martin Baulig
martin gnome org (private)
baulig suse de (work)
_______________________________________________
gnome-hackers mailing list
gnome-hackers gnome org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-hackers
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]