Re: glib 1.2, glib docs, and glib 2.0
- From: Ian Peters <itp helixcode com>
- To: Jeffrey Stedfast <fejj helixcode com>
- Cc: gnome-list gnome org, gnome-hackers gnome org
- Subject: Re: glib 1.2, glib docs, and glib 2.0
- Date: Thu, 30 Nov 2000 15:04:54 -0500
On Fri, Dec 01, 2000 at 12:54:37AM +0500, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote:
> It'd be great if g_basename() returned a const gchar *. Not only does
> this serve as a great way to see whether or not I'm responsible for
> freeing the return value (makes a great way to double check your
> assumptions when reading the docs or function prototypes) but also would
> help catch stupid mistakes as gcc will complain if you try and assign a
> const pointer to a non-const, etc.
I'd also spend some time fixing stuff like this, as I've noticed a
number of places where things should be const (along with libxml,
which in a number of places has functions where the return value is
const xmlChar *, and yet the documentation explicitly asks me to free
the value...)
--
Ian Peters
itp helixcode com
_______________________________________________
gnome-hackers mailing list
gnome-hackers gnome org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-hackers
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]