failure notice (fwd)
- From: Elliot Lee <sopwith redhat com>
- To: <gnome-hackers gnome org>
- Subject: failure notice (fwd)
- Date: Tue, 19 Dec 2000 11:59:58 -0500 (EST)
Is debbugs acting even crankier than usual, or did I goof and still can't
spot it?
-- Elliot
Who me? I just wander from room to room.
---------- Forwarded message ----------
Date: 19 Dec 2000 16:58:53 -0000
From: MAILER-DAEMON tirania nuclecu unam mx
To: sopwith redhat com
Subject: failure notice
Hi. This is the qmail-send program at tirania.nuclecu.unam.mx.
I'm afraid I wasn't able to deliver your message to the following addresses.
This is a permanent error; I've given up. Sorry it didn't work out.
<35608-done bugs gnome org>:
/ Unknown ticket service address <35608-done bugs gnome org
Recognised addresses are:
/ General: Read # in Subject: Ticket # is NNNN:
/ request submit bugs NNNN NNNN-submit
control maintonly NNNN-maintonly
owner quiet NNNN-quiet
postmaster forwarded NNNN-forwarded
done close NNNN-done NNNN-close
submitter NNNN-submitter
/ (all @nic.tln.org.)
/ For instructions via the WWW see:
http://bugs.gnome.org/
http://bugs.gnome.org/Reporting.html
http://bugs.gnome.org/Developer.html
http://bugs.gnome.org/Access.html
Instructions are available from the TLN helpdesk staff
in the files:
doc/bug-reporting.txt
doc/bug-log-access.txt
doc/bug-maint-info.txt
/ For details of how to access ticket report logs by email:
send `request bugs gnome org' the word `help'
--- Below this line is a copy of the message.
Return-Path: <sopwith redhat com>
Received: (qmail 3705 invoked from network); 19 Dec 2000 16:58:51 -0000
Received: from host156.207-175-42.redhat.com (HELO devserv.devel.redhat.com) (207.175.42.156)
by tirania.nuclecu.unam.mx with SMTP; 19 Dec 2000 16:58:51 -0000
Received: from localhost (sopwith localhost)
by devserv.devel.redhat.com (8.11.0/8.11.0) with ESMTP id eBJGvvE31029
for <35608-done bugs gnome org>; Tue, 19 Dec 2000 11:57:57 -0500
X-Authentication-Warning: devserv.devel.redhat.com: sopwith owned process doing -bs
Date: Tue, 19 Dec 2000 11:57:57 -0500 (EST)
From: Elliot Lee <sopwith redhat com>
X-Sender: <sopwith devserv devel redhat com>
To: <35608-done bugs gnome org>
Subject: Re: Bug#35608: ORBIT_retval not always initialised before return
In-Reply-To: <200012191628 QAA22927 ireserver Ireland Sun COM>
Message-ID: <Pine LNX 4 30 0012191150190 24975-100000 devserv devel redhat com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
On Tue, 19 Dec 2000, Colm Smyth wrote:
> The return value from a ORBit stub is not always initialised; if the
> connection _cnx is NULL, e.g. in the XXX_ping stub, then ORBIT_retval
> is not initialised.
This is normal. You need to check for exceptions before making use of the
return value.
-- Elliot
Who me? I just wander from room to room.
_______________________________________________
gnome-hackers mailing list
gnome-hackers gnome org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-hackers
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]