Re: bugzilla resolutions
- From: Owen Taylor <otaylor redhat com>
- To: gnome-hackers gnome org
- Subject: Re: bugzilla resolutions
- Date: 06 Dec 2000 00:48:00 -0500
George <jirka 5z com> writes:
> On Sun, Dec 03, 2000 at 04:31:10PM -0500, Owen Taylor wrote:
> > And if somebody files a bug report:
> > "GTK+ sucks, get it out of here"
> > I think closing it as "NOTABUG" is fine. But again, if people want
> > INVALID as well, it certainly can be included.
> Well if the description for NOTABUG was that the behaviour was the correct
> one, would this be saying that "GTK+ sucks" is the correct behaviour and not
> a bug?
What I wrote for NOTABUG was:
> > NOTABUG
> > The bug report describes behavior which is the correct
> > behavior of the software or was reported in error.
My interpretation would be the second part. What the bug reporter
chooses to think is not my concern.
gnome-hackers mailing list
gnome-hackers gnome org
] [Thread Prev