Re: Standard fonts.
- From: Tim Moore <tmoore tembel org>
- To: Dan Kaminsky <effugas best com>
- cc: gnome-gui-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: Standard fonts.
- Date: Fri, 31 Jul 1998 13:57:32 -0400 (EDT)
On Fri, 31 Jul 1998, Dan Kaminsky wrote:
> I've just decided the *single ugliest* part of X is, undoubtedly, the
> butt-ugly fonts. I think we have two choices for GNOME:
>
> 1) Use the one piece of code Microsoft appears to have released
> semi-publically: Microsoft Web Fonts. Verdana, Georgia, Times New Roman,
> and Arial are *good* fonts, and are in fact quite a bit more attractive than
> the standard fonts I've seen on any other OS.
>
> 2) Find a font designer to provide us with high quality serif, sans serif,
> non-proportional, and special case fonts.
>
> Yes, this is a GNOME issue. Yes, these need to be truetype fonts.
>
> I think this is absolutely critical, without a doubt in my head.
On a related note:
Is there *any* way to provide text anti-aliasing in X? It's one of the
things I miss the most about the BeOS.
Windows has it too (though it isn't done as well IMO) and Mac OS 8.5 will,
so that puts Linux/X/GNOME behind the curve.
Tim Moore
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]