Re: RGSG
- From: sun <as387 yfn ysu edu>
- To: Dan Kaminsky <effugas best com>, gnome-gui-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: RGSG
- Date: Mon, 03 Aug 1998 01:39:11 +0000
Dan Kaminsky wrote:
> Users EXPECT File. Do we gain enough by breaking this expectation? File
> and Edit are needed.
consider digital audio workstations that do audio-sample sequencing.
most of the ones i've used "think" in terms of "projects" or "sessions."
there's no sense in having a "file" menu, considering a five-minute
"session" could be comprised of hundreds of smaller sample files, plus
non-destructive edits files, plus mixer automation files, plus a
sequencing information file...
i think a program should have a "file" menu _only_ if it deals with
individual files as its basic form of storage. most games, for instance,
would not have a "file" menu either. many don't already.
as far as "edit," same story: only include it if there's a real use for
it. if there's no content to copy or paste, your "edit" menu is pretty
worthless. don't put a down button next to an elevator in the basement.
--
"They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary
safety
deserve neither liberty nor safety." --Benjamin Franklin
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]