On Tue, 2006-02-21 at 22:23 +1030, Clytie Siddall wrote: > On 21/02/2006, at 10:18 PM, Joachim Noreiko wrote: > > > I'm almost afraid to ask... did anything get decided? > > I was wondering the same ... did people give up because it all got > too uncomfortable, or were there some recommendations? (upon which we > can act? :D ) It seems to have been decided that applications which are "default" do not use their names in the menus, whereas applications where are not, use them. I filed a bug yesterday which was closed because of that. http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=331919 I can't see any reason for this, and indeed I really think it's a bad idea, but still that appears to be the position. It also has the added drawback that if distributions change the default software for something (e.g. use firefox rather than epiphany), then either they have to patch the documentation too, or just accept that the documentation will be confusing. Matt -- mdke ubuntu com gnupg pub 1024D/0E6B06FF
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part