On Thu, 2004-02-12 at 21:49 +0000, Breda McColgan wrote: > Jaka Moènik wrote: > > > Hello! > > > > On Tue, 2003-10-28 at 10:17, Breda McColgan wrote: > > > > > I see that you have released updated versions of these modules. Can you > > > > > please let me know whether any of the software updates have changed the > > > > > GUI or functionality -- that is, do I need to update the documentation? > > > > Yes, both GHex and GGV have changed their GUIs for 2.5.x: note that > > > > the 2.5.x versions are not stable release quality material and they > > > > are not even gui/string frozen. I suggest you wait with updating the > > > > docs until the GUI freeze. > > > > I will let you know when this happens in case > > > > you do not lurk on desktop-devel-list gnome org > > Well, if you'd like to update the documentation for either GGV or > > GHex, go ahead - their respectful UIs should not changed any more. > > > > regards, > > jaKa > > > > -- > > > > email: jaka gnu org > > w3: http://fish.homeunix.org/people/jaka > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > Name: signature.asc > > signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature > > Description: This is a digitally signed message part > > Thanks, Jaka -- I plan to update the GGV manual in the next week or so. > I'll let you know when the updated manual is ready for review. > > I thought that GHex was no longer shipped in GNOME releases? > GHex isn't listed at the following URL: > http://www.gnome.org/start/2.5/modules/ I doubt that GHex is an official GNOME module as it would be extremely confusing and useless to the majority of users.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part