Re: [gnome-network]Binary units
- From: Germán Poó Caamaño <gpoo ubiobio cl>
- To: "Andreas J. Guelzow" <aguelzow taliesin ca>
- Cc: Christian Rose <menthos gnome org>, gnome-network-list gnome org, GNOME Documentation List <gnome-doc-list gnome org>
- Subject: Re: [gnome-network]Binary units
- Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2003 17:26:04 -0300
El jue, 18-12-2003 a las 17:10, Andreas J. Guelzow escribió:
> On Thu, 2003-12-18 at 12:22, Christian Rose wrote:
> > tor 2003-12-18 klockan 18.55 skrev Andreas J. Guelzow:
> > > 1 KB traditionally has been 1024 byte, we should not change that!
>
> > My point being that just saying that "it's tradition" is as dumb as just
> > saying "it's wrong".
>
> Pardon me? There is a traditional/historic use of KB, MB etc. Moreover,
> none of these abbreviations are covered by SI since B is not an SI unit.
But, they specifically says that prefixs as k, M, G, and so are not
permitted for alternative definitions, like binary.
> > And this is such an excellent example of an area where we could have had
> > the courage to share the lead of development, instead of cowardly just
> > refer to traditional use and leave it like that, just the behavior that
> > we wanted to change.
>
> Perhaps if you would explain the benefit of using decimal powers to
> measure something inherently given in binary powers, you could persuade
> people. But so far the argument in favour of decimal powers eludes me.
I guess the alternative is not to go for decimal powers, it's go
for the binary units standard of IEC with support of CIPM and IEEE.
http://physics.nist.gov/cuu/Units/binary.html
--
Germán Poó Caamaño
mailto:gpoo ubiobio cl
http://www.ubiobio.cl/~gpoo/
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]