Re: 'org chart'
- From: John Fleck <jfleck inkstain net>
- To: Calum Benson <calum benson sun com>
- Cc: Luis Villa <louie ximian com>, gnome-doc-list <gnome-doc-list gnome org>, jrb redhat com
- Subject: Re: 'org chart'
- Date: 16 Oct 2002 06:37:00 -0600
On Wed, 2002-10-16 at 06:04, Calum Benson wrote:
> On Wed, 2002-10-16 at 02:32, John Fleck wrote:
> > The glossary ("word list"?) is part of the style guide. Also, I don't
> > think of reviewing all of the software for style guide compliance as our
> > gig, just the documentation.
> >From a personal point of view, and ignoring things like the number of
> hours in the day, I actually think it's important that the docs people
> *do* review UIs for documentation styleguide compliance, and indeed for
> general sanity-- if something's hard to document, there's a pretty good
> chance it's hard to use. (This isn't to say that the UI guys shouldn't
> have a certain level of familiarity with the doc styleguide as well, of
> The docs guys were invaluable during the 2.0 ui-review, and hopefully
> they will be in the 2.2 ui-review too...
Calum makes a good point. We inevitably end up reviewing the UI as we're
writing the docs. So:
* review all GNOME documentation and UI for documentation style guide
jfleck inkstain net (h) jfleck abqjournal com (w)
"Sometimes, a diner is all about the mac and cheese."
- Zippy the Pinhead
] [Thread Prev