Re: complaint
- From: Pat Costello <Patrick Costello sun com>
- To: Patrick Costello sun com, Eugene Oconnor sun com
- Cc: gnome-doc-list gnome org, director chpi org, koopman sfu ca
- Subject: Re: complaint
- Date: Wed, 2 Oct 2002 16:03:48 +0100 (BST)
Eugene,
I still think it's worthwhile considering making the Solaris-variant of the UG
more generally available, as we can keep the pdf file easily updated. The few
areas where there are differences may be acceptable to the users.
Pat
> X-Accept-Language: en
> MIME-Version: 1.0
> To: Pat Costello <Patrick Costello sun com>
> CC: gnome-doc-list gnome org, director chpi org, koopman sfu ca
> Subject: Re: complaint
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
>
> Pat,
>
> There is a significant difference in the Solaris-variant in the removable
media section - this is completely different to the non-Solaris removable media
information. But elsewhere the differences are minor.
>
> Eugene
>
> Pat Costello wrote:
> >
> > eugene oconnor said:
> >
> > >
> > > However, I don't know how feasible it is to create a fresh PDF of the User
> > Guide every time there is an update. Eric, does it involve much effort to
create
> > the PDF from the XML?
> > >
> > Well, if people are not too fussy, we could put up the Solaris-variant of
the
> > GNOME User Guide in pdf. The advantage is that we create a fresh pdf file of
the
> > UG anyway every time we do an update to the source files, so there is an
> > automatic creation process. The disadvantage is that there are a few
mentions of
> > Solaris. The only place where this is really a bother is in the starting a
> > session section.
> >
> > Pat
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]