Re: NT: XHTML? (was: Release of a new set of XML/XSLT libraries)

[Julian Missig <julian jabber org>]

XHTML remains valid XML, and thus is easy for an XML parser to deal
with. The intent is that eventually you could make plain XML browsers,
and just have an XHTML stylesheet built into the browser. Any other
purpose you could imagine using an XML parser for would also be easy to
do on XHTML...

Julian

On 05 May 2001 09:25:50 -0600, John Fleck wrote:
> On Sat, May 05, 2001 at 11:18:45AM -0400, David Mason wrote:
> 
> > 
> > I can see little to no difference between the HTML and XHTML output -
> > but that is based on a somewhat quick view.
> > 
> > Cheers,
> > 
> 
> Are there any arguments in favor of HTML over XHTML or vice versa,
> since the output is essentially the same?
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> John Fleck
> jfleck inkstain net (h)
> jfleck abqjournal com (w)
> http://www.abqjournal.com/scitech/
> http://www.inkstain.net/fleck/
> 
> _______________________________________________
> gnome-doc-list mailing list
> gnome-doc-list gnome org
> http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-doc-list

-- 
email: julian jabber org
jabber:julian jabber org