Re: Comments on Docs
- From: Alexander Kirillov <kirillov math sunysb edu>
- To: gnome-doc-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: Comments on Docs
- Date: Mon, 4 Sep 2000 08:50:49 -0400
I think it is a bad idea. db2html generates id (if there is none)
according to the line of the original document. Thus, depending on the
location of the <legalnotice> line in the original doc, you could get
ln7.html, ln8.html, etc.
It'd be much better if instead we always use
<legalnotice id="legalnotice">
which ensures that it db2html will always produce file with name
"legalnotice.html"
Sasha
On Sun, Sep 03, 2000 at 01:33:12AM -0500, Dan Mueth wrote:
>
> >
> > Ahhhhhh! DOH - I should've guessed. Still - the only 'logical' way for me to
> > get the license is to pretend it has its own id (that people will agree not to
> > use in their docs). Is it okay to use say 'legalnotice' (i.e. gnome-db2html2
> > /path/to/file.sgml?legalnotice)
>
> We should use 'ln7'. db2html generally names each html file after the
> id. For the legalnotice, which does not have an id, it uses the filename
> 'ln7.html', as if it had the id="ln7".
>
> Generally, I think we should try to keep things as similar to db2html with
> the gdp-both.dsl stylesheets as possible, unless we have a very good
> reason not to. This will prevent odd problems from creeping in and will
> help us out with integrating Dewey since Dewey's targets must work for
> both db2html and gnome-db2html2. Thus, naming targets which do not have
> an explicit id should be done in a similar way to db2html.
>
> Dan
>
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]