Re: question about RMB

[otaylor redhat com]

John Kodis <kodis jagunet com> writes:

> On Mon, Oct 16, 2000 at 08:52:39AM +1100, Malcolm Tredinnick wrote:
> > On Sun, Oct 15, 2000 at 04:32:39PM -0500, Dan Mueth wrote:
> > > On Sun, 15 Oct 2000, Mark Tearle wrote:
> > > > 
> > > > In terms of documentation, the way around it would be to use
> > > > something like "Button 1 (Left)" with the thing in brackets
> > > > indicating the normal assignment.
> > 
> > I find this a bit too wordy and would prefer just "Button 1"
> 
> Same here.  Also, "Button 1" is the notation used by X, and I can't
> see the point of cluttering it up with a clairification (Left) that
> will be wrong for ~15% of the population.

Well, I think most peopel in the discussion know this, but since it
hasn't been brought up the problem with 1,2,3 is that for some reason,
people seem to think the buttons are numbered, left to right, 1,3,2.

(Because, I assume, the middle button is "extra" compared to the
windows standard)

Regards,
                                        Owen