Re: comprehensiveness and completeness of large docs

["pat eyler" <p_eyler hotmail com>]

>From: Aaron Weber <aaron@helixcode.com>
>To: Gnome-Doc-List <gnome-doc-list@gnome.org>
>Subject: comprehensiveness and completeness of large docs
>Date: Wed, 09 Aug 2000 01:01:54 -0400
>
>
>But for Evolution, I'm having a little conceptual trouble.
>
>Do I put all the menu-bars in big appendix as a reference of all
>functionality, sorted by component and indexed by task?  Or should I put
>a menu-bar section at the end of each window description?  How about
>just making sure that everything is covered somewhere and having a
>really good index?

I think you would be best served by two and three.  Each component
(window?) of Evolution should have it's own menubar section.  You probably 
also want an emacs manual style set of indices (Key, Command, Variable, and 
Concept) for the manual as a whole.


>
>I'm leaning towards the second most of the time, and towards the first
>one some of the time.  The third just seems too hard to keep track of.
>What say ye?
>
>a.
>
>_______________________________________________
>gnome-doc-list mailing list
>gnome-doc-list@gnome.org
>http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-doc-list

________________________________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com