Re: Content of GNOME Developer's Guide

[Christopher Gabriel <cgabriel tin it>]

Mark Galassi writes:
 > 
 >     John> Oh, gee, I don't know.  I suppose licensing is wide open at
 >     John> this point.  I had assumed a GPL, but I have no overriding
 >     John> attachment to it (for docs anyway).  What would you suggest?
 > 
 > I think docs for GNU projects should be GPLed.  "verbatim only" terms
 > are an abomination for a manual describing free software: docs should
 > be as free as the software.
 > 

Something like the LDP license?

Christopher