RE: gconf

["Foster, Gareth" <gareth foster siemens com>]

> In part it's just inherently confusing the way it works now. 
> The biggest
> bang for the buck would be to fix up things to work in a simpler way.
> (http://www.gnome.org/projects/gconf/plans.html)
> 

Oh dear.

That page goes someway to relieve/explain my frustration yesterday. I had
assumed that it was either my ineptitude, my inability to find the right
documentation or the lack or said documentation.

Is gconf actually considered to be quite 'broken' in some regards then?

Gaz