Re: GConf-question about schemas
- From: Maciej Katafiasz <mnews22 wp pl>
- To: my_mailing_lists <my_mailing_lists email it>
- Cc: gnome-devel-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: GConf-question about schemas
- Date: Tue, 31 Aug 2004 19:31:26 +0200
Dnia 27-08-2004, pią o godzinie 13:28 +0200, my_mailing_lists napisał:
> I have started to read docs about GConf, but I have a big-big-doubt:
>
> My app uses xml2 to save datas/options (status for check-flag options,
> string in entries, etc). Is GConf-schemas useful to substitute xml2-
> lib? Or has it other goals?
Schemas are special mechanism of GConf that allows for giving some
interpretation of keys. You can think of them as meta-keys, that can:
a) specify type and name of key, so that it's known to gconf even if
unset
b) give human readable description, ie. comments field you see in gconf-
editor.
So GConf schemas are for GConf what, well, XML Schemas are for XML ;).
Now answering your question - yes, for storing options you use can
GConf. Schemas are part of GConf, so in a way you'll be using them too.
> Sorry for this lame-question:)
Np, schemas are indeed hard to grasp at first.
HTH,
Maciej
--
"Tautologizm to coś tautologicznego"
Maciej Katafiasz <mnews2 wp pl>
http://mathrick.blog.pl
[
Date Prev][Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]