Re: gtk+ version in cvs

[Darryl Rees <rees netnam vn>]

Gerald,

I've had similar problems with gnomecvs head a couple of times - local 
repos seems to get stuck in a time warp. No idea what is going on, but I 
just delete the whole repository and check the whole thing out again. 
Make sure your local repository really is HEAD (make sure you don't have 
a CVS/Tag) before doing anything drastic. One day I'll try to 
investigate what is going on properly.

Cheers,
Darryl.

Gerold J. Wucherpfennig wrote:

> On Sunday 04 May 2003 16:46, Owen Taylor wrote:
>  
>
> > On Sun, 2003-05-04 at 10:27, Gerold J. Wucherpfennig wrote:
> >    
> >
> > > I've built gtk+ from cvs HEAD, but unfortunately the
> > > version number is 2.2.0 and not 2.2.1 (gtk+-2.0.pc).
> > > My local cvs tree is clean and up-to-date, so I can't
> > > understand this. I'm using cvs HEAD.
> > > Has anybody an idea what's wrong?
> > >      
> > If you want the newer-than-2.2.1 version, use the gtk-2-2
> > branch of GTK+.
> >    
>
> Thanks, but that's not my problem.
>
> The problem is that with cvs HEAD, I get a gtk 2.2.0.
> The strange thing is, that I did a clean build and my local cvs dir is
> up-to-date.
>
> Then eog fails, because it wants gtk 2.2.1, but I don't have that :-(
>
>
>  
>
> > HEAD is always a bit risky, one way or the other; we'll bump
> > the version to 2.3.x soon, but haven't done so yet for various
> > reasons.
> >    
>
> No RISC, no fun ;-)
>
>
> Regards,
>
> Gerold
>
> _______________________________________________
> gnome-devel-list mailing list
> gnome-devel-list gnome org
> http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-devel-list
>
>