RE: Trivial patches on b.g.o covers dust.

[Kjartan Maraas <kmaraas online no>]

tir, 22.04.2003 kl. 12.12 skrev Ali Akcaagac:
> On Tue, 2003-04-22 at 11:53, Murray Cumming Comneon com wrote:
> > One more thing: If you have confirmed that these bugs still exist
> > then it is probably a good idea to move them from GNOMEVER2.2 to
> > GNOMEVER2.3. But again, that's an issue for the bugsquad.
> 
> Good point. It would be nice and actually urgently required that the
> bugsquad takes actions that something actually happens with these
> patches. If they are not accepted by the Maintainers then they should go
> and close them and don't leave them open for 6 months or longer. The

Like for all things in universe resources are not infinite. If you think
the bugsquad needs to work faster, you need to join in the fun :-)

[SNIP]

> gtk+ and libgnomeui toolbar fixes
> ---------------------------------
> http://mail.gnome.org/archives/usability/2003-March/msg00007.html
> 

This is pending Owen's feedback I guess
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=106336

This one is on Anders' plate?
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=106342

The bonobo toolbar one has been commited to HEAD and was rejected for
2.2.x by the release team.

> Would be pretty nice if someone could finally sent these patches to CVS.
> I'm getting tired applying these things manually here whenever I compile
> CVS GNOME. All in all it's less than 15 chars changes in 2 files and we
> all benefit from more esthetics in the Toolbar.
> 
> gnome-terminal easy-closes
> --------------------------
> http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=78903

The maintainer requested that the patch was slightly reworked and
nothing has happened since...

> http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=98589

Pending feedback from Havoc.

> http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=77134

Doesn't have a patch that works.

> http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=82062

Pending blessing from maintainer?

> http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=90294

Closed by request of Ali :)

> http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=90720

I've added a patch to do the suggested changes there now.

> http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=94887

Looks like it should be applied. Saves 120 kb off the binary

> http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=106133

Same here. Not very important though.

> http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=108711

Needs information

> http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=109356

Should go in I guess.

> http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=110979

Needs feedback from Havoc

> http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=110999

I've upped the priority on this now.

> http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=107285

Added some keywords and upped the pri on this too.


> gnome panel
> -----------
> http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=85605

Needs review.

> http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=103342

Needs a new foot icon it seems...

> http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=105148

Was already commited. Closed

> http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=106565

Needs discussion/feedback.

> http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=108677

Needs discussion/feedback

> http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=111064

Updated with keywords and pri.

> http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=111268

No patch, just a diff to describe the problem. NEEDINFOd

> http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=75103

Added keywords and upped pri.

> http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=107146

Looks like it still needs some work.

> http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=108283

Added some comments here.

Well, now someone needs to go through the other lists and do this stuff
there too :)

Cheers
Kjartan