Re: Gnome-libs 1.2.11 configure error - libdb and dbopen()
- From: Matt Schalit <mschalit pacbell net>
- To: Ben Taylor <sol7x86 hotmail com>
- Cc: gnome-devel-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: Gnome-libs 1.2.11 configure error - libdb and dbopen()
- Date: Thu, 01 Feb 2001 18:04:44 -0800
Ben Taylor wrote:
>
> You have to use DB-2.7.7 with DB1.85 compatiblity
> mode.
>
> Ben
Ben!
That was the right answer. You saved me, thanks!
Of course, gmake failed, but that's a whole nother story :)
According to the folks at Sleepycat, libdb-3.1.so should have
had __db185_open in it, as shown to me with an nm output, but
mine didn't have it, even though I used --enable-compat185.
And my DB-3.1.17 passed the entire testsuite, so we'll have to see
what they say.
Be well,
Matt
> >From: Matt Schalit <mschalit pacbell net>
> >To: gnome-devel-list gnome org
> >Subject: Gnome-libs 1.2.11 configure error - libdb and dbopen()
> >Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2001 19:44:55 -0800
> >
> >
> >
> >Hi Folks,
> >I'm new to the list, but I've been trying to compile
> >gnome-libs for a few weeks :-)
> >
> >
> >I'm trying to compile gnome-libs-1.2.11 on i586-sco-sysv5uw7.1.1
> >using gcc 2.95.2.1 and gnu-make 3.79.1.
> >
> >The configure error says BerkeleyDB 1.85 compatablity is not
> >available, even though I have BDB 3.1.17 installed, which passed
> >all it's tests and was compiled with --enable-compat185, so the
> >185 stuff is there.
> >
> >Here's my configure command:
> >
> > CPPFLAGS=-I/usr/local/BerkeleyDB.3.1/include \
> > LDFLAGS=-L/usr/local/BerkeleyDB.3.1/lib LIBS="-lsocket -lnsl -pthread" \
> > ./configure --x-libraries=/usr/X/lib --x-includes=/usr/X/include
> >--disable-nls
> >
> >
> >Here's what I know from the config.log:
> >
> > 1) libdb.so is being found.
> >
> > 2) libdb-3.so is being found.
> >
> > 3) the gcc statement to comile a conftest.c in each case
> > succeeds, but the ld phase doesn't.
> >
> > 4) I always get an error with the ld phase, no matter
> > whether it was bdb-2.7.7, 3.1.17, or 3.2.3h.
> >
> >
> >Please be kind and take a look at the following config.log.
> >Does this issue ring a bell with anyone? My apologies if
> >this is the wrong list.
> >
> >
> >Thanks,
> >Matthew
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]