[no subject]

http://linuxtoday.com/news_story.php3?ltsn=2001-10-20-002-20-OP-MS

On Sat, 2001-12-22 at 21:07, Seth Nickell wrote:

    > The Free Software Foundation is for total disclosure as soon as
    > possible.
    > Microsoft is for total secrety until the patch is released.
    > 
    > There are arguments on both sides of the story, and a search on the
    > Internet will give you all the arguments of both camps. However GNU , I
    > think, is for total disclosure as early as possible, so as the G in
    > GNOME means GNU then the path is easy to follow.
    
    Could you send us a link to this? I have never heard a stance by GNU or
    the FSF on security hole disclosure...
    
    -Seth
    

--=-kWTHZET1GizTXBhoex49
Content-Type: text/html; charset=utf-8

<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 TRANSITIONAL//EN">
<HTML>
<HEAD>
  <META HTTP-EQUIV="Content-Type" CONTENT="text/html; CHARSET=UTF-8">
  <META NAME="GENERATOR" CONTENT="GtkHTML/0.16.1">
</HEAD>
<BODY>
<A HREF="http://www.linuxtoday.com/news_story.php3?ltsn=2000-10-17-014-04-SC-CY";>http://www.linuxtoday.com/news_story.php3?ltsn=2000-10-17-014-04-SC-CY</A>
<BR>

<BR>
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]